Feminist Practice: Early career researchers and Global South perspectives

About the project

With a foundation in intersectional feminist principles, the project aims to create a transformative space within academia, emphasising the equal significance of the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of research, in relation to the ‘what’ is ultimately produced. This initiative unfolded through year-long monthly online conversations involving early career researchers (ECRs) and practitioners within the Gender, Justice, and Security Hub. Central to these conversation circles is a commitment to intentional, relational, connective, and generative engagement.

This project provides a platform for participants to share experiences and reflections on the ‘unhealthy’ dynamics prevalent in research environments, fostering a network of peer support to combat senses of isolation and alienation. Secondly, the insights gained through these conversations contribute to knowledge production on aspects of organic and nurturing practice-based solidarity, and collectively explore conversation as a feminist method essential for transforming the rigid structures and hierarchies entrenched in academic spaces.

For decision making to escape rather than to reproduce old structures and hierarchies, it should be grounded in high level understanding of the ways in which our positionalities impact and perhaps also alter the lives of others, human and non-human around us.

Addressing power dynamics

Among the issues addressed are the existing power dynamics between the global North and global South, ableism, gender disparities, professional hierarchies, precarious work conditions, inclusivity, and accountability within feminist and/or academic spaces. Additionally, the project explores the impact of the prevalent emphasis on output over process, often sacrificing genuine positive relationships and the wellbeing of those involved and leading to mechanical productivity devoid of creativity and flexibility.

A transformative approach

These themes highlight the necessity for a transformative approach, specifically an organic and fluid conversational practice that facilitates an ongoing process of unlearning and relearning. By providing a space for introspection and self-reflection, free of judgement, the process has proved to deepen interest in and attachment to the project. It has become a platform for personal growth and connection with others, wherein participants confront their discomfort with silence, the urge to rush to fill it, as well as tendencies towards negation, defensiveness, and avoidance of addressing expressions of unease or ‘negative’ feelings within the group. This journey also involves facing one’s own inclinations towards self-control and policing.

The core of conversation lies in the dynamic of interaction, silence, and diversity of experiences, working, thinking and relating – not only between thoughts but also in the evolution of thought itself as the conversation unfolds.

On conversation

The core of conversation lies in the dynamic of interaction, silence, and diversity of experiences, working, thinking and relating – not only between thoughts but also in the evolution of thought itself as the conversation unfolds. There is also the creative chaos within conversation that enables connections and departures in non-hierarchical and non-prescriptive ways, with neither beginning nor end, which may be undermined with academic writing styles that can disavow anything personal or remotely emotive.

The pursuit of transformation, albeit imperfectly achieved, has diversified ways of thinking, and creating outputs. Embracing imperfection liberates dialogue from the pressure of providing definitive answers. Disagreements and challenges are viewed as opportunities for growth. Importantly, by emphasising the collective nature of knowledge production and the significance of genuine engagement, the project underscores how transformative conversational practice rooted in feminist principles can challenge entrenched structures, foster meaningful inclusivity, and cultivate solidarity within academic and professional spheres.

We consider friendship as central for creating knowledge, and I think this gives us the opportunity to move something that looks personal, private, as friendship is, to a more public sphere, like our professional field.